Tuesday, October 31, 2023

Who Watches the Watchmen?: Time for the adaptations!


Now I can finally start looking at the many adaptations of Watchmen to see how other creators interpreted Alan Moore’s work. Of course, I’m using the word “adaptation” quite loosely with the first projects I’m looking at. But I don’t really have a better word for it. Additions? Non-canonical supplemental adventures? Eh, I won’t worry about it.

Before Moore and Dave Gibbons had even finished their 12-issue story, DC began working on two modules for their DC Heroes role playing game. The first, written by Dan Greenberg, was called “Who Watches the Watchmen?” (I’ve never played DC Heroes, but I am experienced with Dungeons & Dragons, so I get the concept.)

Greenberg had a difficult task of turning these deeply flawed, unlikable characters into something players would like to be. His solution was to set the story back in the 60s, when the Watchmen were young and most closely resembled traditional superheroes. Of course, these characters really didn’t do much together as a team, so Greenberg cleverly found a good excuse to bring everyone together.

The story takes place shortly after Captain Metropolis’ failed attempt of uniting all the major costumed vigilantes of the day. Someone close to each of the Watchmen has been kidnapped and Captain Metropolis coordinates the rescue mission. But none of the players realize that Metropolis was behind all the kidnappings in a desperate attempt to unite the heroes and frame Moloch.

It’s a pretty straight-forward mission, if a little “railroady.” I’d imagine it’d get rather redundant having to investigate seven separate kidnappings. But the neat thing is how the campaign handles the true mystery. It’s entirely possible for players to rescue all the hostages and capture Moloch and have no idea that Captain Metropolis was actually behind it. Of course, most players should be able to put the clues together by the end. Wisely, Greenberg recognizes how sharp-eyed players would be suspicious of Metropolis right from the beginning, so he recommends coordinating with another player ahead of time to play Captain Metropolis and present him as just another character in the game.

The biggest obstacle is Dr. Manhattan. Out of a sense of obligation, I suppose, Greenberg did include the off-the-chart statistics for Dr. Manhattan. But he included a stern warning to only use him if absolutely necessary, as he can easily break a game like this.

A slightly smaller obstacle is the fact that it’s still rather odd to imagine anyone wanting to be Rorschach or the Comedian or even Ozymandias. Greenberg tries to allay these concerns by saying things like this adventure takes place before Rorschach went fully insane, and the Comedian wasn’t quite as ruthless and violent as he later became. And all the players are supposed to pretend they don’t know that Adrian Veidt has secretly begun his work to cause Armageddon. It’s all a bit of a stretch, but I think it’s the best anyone could have done with such an assignment.

Gibbons drew the cover (a rather boring image, if you ask me) and he provided a few new sketches for inside. But most of the art is bland stock images, presented in mundane black-and-white. I have no idea how well this was received, but that’s not really the point. The point is that DC recognized they had a massive hit with Watchmen right away and sought to capitalize on its success every way they could imagine — even if that meant making slightly awkward role playing games.

On a whole, I feel like Greenberg followed Moore’s vision rather faithfully. It could easily be inserted into the Watchmen story without disrupting anything. And I especially liked the twist of making Captain Metropolis the villain. After all, in the main series he was portrayed as a racist, closeted homosexual with a naïve, regressive worldview. I fully support any story that reminds the audience that these characters are not really the good guys.

Tuesday, October 24, 2023

Redrafting the Jazz: 2006


I have been cursed by a witch to repeatedly travel back through time to relive every NBA draft. Fortunately, her spell sends me directly to the Utah Jazz war room on draft night and all the executives magically know I’m from the future and will do whatever I say. Unfortunately, the curse prevents me from seeing how my advice altered the future, as I am sent back to the previous year as soon as draft night ends.

June 28, 2006 – Madison Square Garden, New York City

Previous season:

Three seasons removed from Stockton and Malone, the Jazz were still rebuilding in 2005-06. But a promising picture was beginning to take shape with Mehmet Okur, Andrei Kirilenko, Carlos Boozer and Deron Williams. But injuries limited Boozer to 33 games and Williams was just a rookie, so Utah only earned 41 wins and missed the playoffs.

The draft:

With the 14th pick, Utah drafted Ronnie Brewer, a defensive-minded swing man from Arkansas.

Thanks to a 2003 trade involving John Amaechi and Glen Rice, the Jazz owned Chicago’s second-round pick (No. 46), which they used on Deron Williams’ old Illinois teammate, point guard Dee Brown.

And with the 47th pick, Utah selected Paul Millsap, a power forward from Louisiana Tech.

Analysis:

Ronnie Brewer’s hustle quickly won him over with Jerry Sloan and he became a full-time starter in his second season. His terrible outside shooting certainly limited him offensively, but he was excellent at attacking the rim and scored a decent amount of points off layups and dunks. But what really set him apart was his defense. In the two full seasons he was a starter for Utah, he finished in the top 10 in the NBA for steals. Unfortunately, Brewer was traded to the Grizzlies during his fourth season, just to help the Jazz avoid the luxury tax. Brewer was injured the moment he arrived in Memphis and was never the same.

Brewer truly was exactly what the Jazz needed at that moment in time. He fit in so naturally with the starting lineup and was a big reason for Utah’s success in that three-year stretch. It wasn’t his fault Kevin O’Connor couldn’t find a better way to save the franchise money. And I don’t think it’s entirely unreasonable for me to suggest that maybe Brewer wouldn’t have torn his hamstring had he been able to stay in Utah. I’m a firm believer in the role emotions and stress can play on injuries, and Brewer’s trade was a pretty big shock — especially to Williams.

Yes, I know Rajon Rondo and Kyle Lowry have had much better careers. But I don’t think either of them would have been as good a fit on the Jazz at this time as Brewer was. So, slightly to my surprise, I’m going to recommend the Jazz stick with Brewer here.

Dee Brown helped Williams guide Illinois to a legendary 37-2 season, and it seemed like he was also destined for a great NBA career. But then he broke his foot and decided to go back to school for one more year. By the time he made it to the Jazz, he wasn’t nearly the explosive player he once was. Utah did give him 49 games to try to prove himself, but his NBA career never panned out.

So I recommend replacing Brown with Puerto Rico’s José Juan (J.J.) Barea. The undersized point guard used his tremendous grit and deep knowledge of the game to have a long, productive career with the Dallas Mavericks. I think he’s just the player Sloan would have loved.

Paul Millsap was one of Utah’s greatest draft picks of all time. Very few players taken this deep in the draft develop into four-time All-Stars. Unfortunately, Millsap made all those All-Star games after he left Utah and signed with Atlanta. He gave the Jazz seven very solid seasons, but when his contract expired, I felt like the team didn’t try very hard to keep him. Maybe his time in Utah would have been even better had he been encouraged to develop his 3-point shot earlier. Or if he wasn’t saddled alongside Al Jefferson right after he emerged from Boozer’s shadow. Regardless, the production he gave Utah was incredible, and there’s no way I’m recommending anyone else.

My advice:

1. Use the 14th pick on Ronnie Brewer.
2. Use the 46th pick on J.J. Barea.
3. Use the 47th pick on Paul Millsap.

This is the 12th draft I have redone for the Jazz. And it’s only the second time I’ve left the first-round pick as is. (Heck, if Dee Brown had been even slightly better, I might have even suggested no changes at all!) I know Ronnie Brewer wasn’t the best player available at that pick, but I think he was the best fit. And who knows what he could have developed into had he been able to stay and avoid injury.

Saturday, October 21, 2023

Watchmen #12: The end of the beginning


Here it is. I am finally almost done with my page-by-page review of Watchmen. And this isn’t the end — it’s only the beginning of my grander goal of looking at all the adaptations of Watchmen to see how closely they fit what I perceived to be Alan Moore’s original vision.


This issue has one of the most powerful openings in all comics. Six silent splash pages depicting grotesque horror.


Gibbons didn’t do any official two-page spreads in this series. But he came frustratingly close a couple of times. I just want to go in and tweak that tentacle ever so slightly to make it line up.


It was a little convenient to have all these minor characters at the same place at midnight. But it does make for a satisfying, albeit macabre finale for them.


At the center of everything is poor Bernard and Bernie — the man who read all the newspapers and the boy who read all the comic books. They, like most of the other victims of this attack, are some of the very few truly likable characters of this story. Which helps give this tragedy some real stakes.


I had previously wondered how long it took Dr. Manhattan to teleport to and from Mars. Perhaps it was usually instantaneous, but the story doesn’t specifically say. I wish Dr. Manhattan would have said something like he wanted to go back two days ago. Regardless, the tachyons somehow caused him to skip ahead in time a bit — lost in teleportation limbo from Mars for 48 hours. I can only presume that was a happy accident of Adrian’s plan.


For the first time in years, Dr. Manhattan feels the sensation of surprise. And he gets so excited by this, it takes him a minute to acknowledge Laurie’s suffering — again.


Adrian won’t stop belittling Rorschach and I am here for it!


My biggest frustration with Watchmen. If young Robert Deschaines really was the key, then why didn’t we ever get to see him?


For the first — and only — time in this story, Adrian is legitimately afraid. He does fear for his life, but I think he’s also worried that Dr. Manhattan’s arrival means that he also prevented the attack in New York.



Dave Gibbons devotes a lot of space to Laurie making her way into Adrian’s lair. This highlights her continued isolation and unfortunate role as the most forgettable character in this cast. But I also think Gibbons and Moore were trying to build up the tension of Laurie bringing a gun to the final confrontation. Personally, I think that bit fell flat.


It’s quite impressive how Adrian’s preparation (and paranoia) led to him recreating the device that turned Jon Osterman into Dr. Manhattan. It’s also quite lucky that Adrian was able to put Dr. Manhattan in range of this machine.


This was unnecessary. It feels like Alan Moore saw what he concerned a plot hole in Adrian’s staged assassination and decided to justify it after the fact. But I never worried about the possibility of the gunman hitting Adrian first instead of the secretary. If Adrian knew when and where the hitman would be, he would have had ample time to protect himself. I also worry that having him “catch” a bullet makes him too powerful. I thought the only one here with real superpowers was Dr. Manhattan. Adrian’s already the smartest and the best fighter. Does he really need another physical ability outside the realm of human feasibility?


I do love this line, though. Adrian has just pulled off his decades-long scheme, easily bested Nite Owl and Rorschach in hand-to-hand combat, obliterated the most powerful being in the universe, and even caught a bullet. He has no time for Dan’s chivalry.


Dr. Manhattan hasn’t been in a real fight in a long, long time. Yes, this is a dramatic act of intimidation. But it’s not very efficient. Obviously he wanted to question Adrian before killing him, but he wastes time trying to belittle him. I guess it’s just a petty act from the allegedly emotionless being.


Hey, Jon! That termite just pulled off the greatest conspiracy of all time right under your nose! (Man, I’m really becoming an Adrian cheerleader here …)


Even though we knew Adrian’s plan worked, he had no confirmation of it until he turned on his TVs. And for the first time in this story, he permits himself to celebrate like a normal human. It’s a rather unsettling sight to see him exhibit so much emotion, especially when one considers what, exactly, he’s cheering.


I am stunned, absolutely gobsmacked that this conversation only lasted three panels. I’m not saying it’s wrong to have these characters ultimately come to these conclusions, but they needed to have a longer conversation about it! This is the story that spent an entire issue teaching Dr. Manhattan the value of life. But this incredibly complex moral problem is condensed to a few quick lines?


It’s a little surprising that Adrian didn’t kill his “guests,” considering how he coldly murdered his most loyal servants to prevent the slim possibility that one of them would expose him in the future. I suppose Adrian initially wanted someone to gloat to. And once Dr. Manhattan showed up, he probably assumed that he wouldn’t let anything bad to happen to Laurie (and maybe even Dan). As for Rorschach, well, it’s refreshing to see Adrian’s finally realized he’s not much of a threat. I’ll still maintain that Adrian needn’t have bothered conspiring to throw Rorschach in jail.


This issue has so much to get through — so many loose ends to tie up and deep conversations to have — that the pacing sometimes feels a bit jarring. Especially this moment. Adrian abruptly leaves his “guests,” Dr. Manhattan leaves to kill Rorschach, and Dan and Laurie spontaneously start making love. It’s an absolutely insane response to this moment, but I guess that’s sort of the point. How would people to a situation like this? Especially Laurie, who still hasn’t had time to reconcile with the revelation of her true father?


Rorschach may be an idiot, but he’s not stupid. (Wait, does that even mean anything?) He knows he’ll never be able to find his way back to the Owlship, get it working again, and fly it all the way back to New York. But he has to try because he can’t conceive of anything else to do. Yes, he’s made a bunch of compromises during his life, but he doesn’t count those because they were born of the cognitive dissonance in his own brain. It’s when someone else asks him to compromise that makes him dig in his heels and double down on his illusions. And finally, at the very end, he’ll pay for this obstinance with his life.


This is not the portrait of a courageous martyr fighting for his beliefs until the end. This is a terrified, defeated, sorry excuse for a man. He’s not daring Dr. Manhattan to show some backbone. He’s begging Jon to save him the indignity of freezing to death on the Antarctic plains. He’s pleading to be saved from himself.


Dr. Manhattan’s actions are rather perplexing at the end of this story. It’s almost like a new, more assertive Dr. Manhattan was born after Adrian “killed” him. Does he still see himself as a puppet bound to the predetermined future? Or does he now finally realize that he possesses the power to influence the world around him? After he reformed himself, he led the brief, yet crucial discussion on accepting Adrian’s plan. He then committed what can best be described as a mercy killing of Rorschach, before walking in on Laurie and Dan sleeping in each other’s arms. He grants a smile of approval before oddly choosing to walk across the water of Adrian’s swimming pool. Was this an unconscious act of one considering taking on the role of a god? Or was he “testing the waters” of divinity?


In one of my favorite parts of the story, Adrian allows himself to be vulnerable in private with Dr. Manhattan. He reveals the pressing doubt he surely felt during every step of his massive plan. Adrian begs the seer to tell him he did the right thing, but he only gets vague answers in reply. Dr. Manhattan is leaving this world to create a new one. Is that because this world is destined to become a utopia that won’t need his services anymore? Or is it now tainted beyond redemption? The doctor coyly will never say.


From what I understand, DC made a deal with Moore to give him back the rights to Watchmen as soon as they stopped publishing Watchmen stories. But DC quickly learned this is a cash cow that will never dry out. Every few years, they release a new collection of the core story in hard cover, paperback, oversized omnibus format, new coloring, no coloring at all, and on and on. Then there’s the adaptations, including the movie, the prequel comics, the sequel TV series, and many other little things in between. No, Watchmen will never end.


I’m a little surprised that this issue — overfilling with content it can’t fit — would devote three full pages to Sally. I guess Moore really wanted to get in that “you look like a waitress” line (which is a great line, by the way). But seriously, I do understand the need to have some closure to this relationship. Laurie’s forgiveness comes quickly and easily, which is hard to imagine happening without the apocalyptic event putting things in perspective. Maybe she would have eventually gotten there on her own, but I think it would have taken longer.


The story began with Eddie Blake dying on the street. It ends with his portrait being kissed by the woman he attempted to rape, then later fathered a child with. Sally’s relationship with Eddie is so complex and messy and confusing — a wonderful encapsulation of this entire story. Bad people don’t always do bad things. Good people don’t always do good things. We sometimes grow to love the people we hate. And even switch back and forth several times through our lives. Nothing is as neat and tidy as we’d like. And that’s part of the power of this story. It dared to feature a main cast of unlikable characters. It didn’t shy away from an unsatisfactory ending. Giving in to those conventional tropes would have robbed the readers the chance to ponder the unanswerable questions Moore asked.


I consider the last two pages an epilogue. It’s been some time since Adrian’s fake invasion — probably a year or more. New York is cleaned and repaired. There are new electric chargers on the streets and restaurants bizarrely selling American and Russian cuisine. But through all that upheaval, the radical New Frontiersman survived with the same old abusive editor and poor little Seymour who never thought to get a new job. But it’s a good thing he stuck around — he’s about to stumble upon the biggest story of the century.


What a glorious final panel. Alan Moore, Dave Gibbons and John Higgins have told their story. And now they leave it in our hands. For better and worse, “our” includes DC Comics, which has unceasingly sought to profit off this story. The slew of adaptations and reprintings isn’t necessarily a bad thing — even at their worst, terrible sequels can’t tarnish the image of a masterpiece.

Tuesday, October 3, 2023

Redrafting the Jazz: 2007


I have been cursed by a witch to repeatedly travel back through time to relive every NBA draft. Fortunately, her spell sends me directly to the Utah Jazz war room on draft night and all the executives magically know I’m from the future and will do whatever I say. Unfortunately, the curse prevents me from seeing how my advice altered the future, as I am sent back to the previous year as soon as draft night ends.

June 28, 2007 – Madison Square Garden, New York City

Previous season:

After going 51-31 in the 2006-07 season, the Jazz pulled off a dramatic 7-game victory over Houston in the first round, beat the outmatched Warriors 4-1 in the second round, before being crushed 4-1 by San Antonio. It remains the last time Utah reached the Western Conference Finals. Granted, the Jazz got incredibly lucky when Golden State upset the 67-win Mavericks in the first round. But it still was a good sign for such a young roster — only Matt Harpring and Derek Fisher had more than five years of experience. It seemed all Utah needed to do was add a solid sharpshooter and they’d be set. (Gordan Giricek was NOT getting it done.)

The draft:

With the 25th pick, Kevin O’Connor drafted a sharpshooter from Rice named Morris Almond.

With the 55th pick, the Jazz selected Providence forward Herbert Hill and immediately traded him to Philadelphia for the 38th pick, Ukrainian center Kyrylo Fesenko. Officially, the Jazz were also supposed to give the 76ers “future considerations” for this seemingly lopsided trade. However, I could find no record of what those considerations ended up being.

Previously, I had mentioned O’Connor’s unusually friendly relationship with Philadelphia, his former team. At the 2007 trade deadline, Philadelphia was in danger of going over the salary cap, so they traded Alan Henderson to Utah, along with some cash and the right to swap second-round picks in exchange for … absolutely nothing. Utah immediately waived Henderson, who promptly re-signed with Philadelphia. A few months later, the 76ers seemed to honor this trade by drafting Fesenko for Utah. But O’Connor oddly insisted that the Fesenko trade had nothing to do with the Henderson trade. Yet he refused to explain what else the 76ers wanted in exchange for swapping the 38th pick with the 55th.

My guess is that the Henderson trade was O’Connor doing a favor for his old friends. And then he sheepishly forgot to exercise the pick swap before the draft. His Philadelphia buddies were happy to grant the late swap, but it technically had to recorded as a new, separate trade. And then O’Connor was too embarrassed to admit his mistake later. This is entirely my speculation on the scenario, and it ultimately doesn’t matter.

Analysis:

Morris Almond’s career (or lack of one) remains a perplexing mystery for me. On paper, he was everything the Jazz wanted. He put up big numbers in college and was dominant in the NBA’s Development League. But for some reason, he just could not get any action in real NBA games. And this wasn’t just a case of Jerry Sloan refusing to play his rookies. After two seasons and just 34 games in Utah, Almond spent three years in basketball purgatory (D-League and Europe) before appearing in four games with Washington. And then he retired. I don’t think he had a serious injury. He just … wasn’t that good.

Luckily, I have a solid pick at shooting guard, who was drafted just two spots below Almond. UCLA’s Arron Afflalo enjoyed a productive 11-year career, shooting 38% from 3-point range. I think he would have made a bigger impact on Utah’s roster than Almond.

Herbert Hill never played in the NBA, so the Jazz truly got Fesenko for free. Unfortunately, he never made much of an impact. Perhaps partly due to his enormous size, the Jazz really seemed invested in him and allowed him to stick around for four years — he even got to start nine playoff games in 2010. But his play never rose above the level of frustrating mediocrity. He joined the Pacers after his stint with the Jazz, but only lasted three games with them before exiting the league for good.

Fortunately, at the 38th pick, I have a much, much, much better center available: Spain’s Marc Gasol. A three-time All-Star, member of an All-NBA First Team and Second Team, and a Defensive Player of the Year — I’d be insane to pass on him.

My advice:

1. Use the 25th pick on Arron Aflalo.
2. Tell Philadelphia to use the 38th pick on Marc Gasol and trade him for the 55th pick (Herbert Hill).

Of course, my plan depends entirely on the assumption that Philadelphia asked Utah who they wanted right before they made the 38th pick. If that wasn’t the case (and I’d have to confirm this before the drafting started), then I’d have to use the 25th pick on Gasol. He’s too good to risk losing over a gentleman’s agreement.